Lawyers for the state of Michigan say the dispute over the Line 5 pipeline belongs in state court, countering efforts by Canada and others to have it heard by a federal judge.
In documents filed in court Tuesday, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel also argues that Canada has no legal basis to invoke a 1977 treaty that covers cross-border pipelines.
Line 5 pipeline: How did we get here and what it means for Canada
The brief is Michigan’s stern reply to the argument by Calgary-based Enbridge Inc., the pipeline’s owner, that the case belongs in federal court.
China reports world’s first human case of H10N3 bird flu
Ontario reports 733 new COVID-19 cases, 7-day average drops below 1,000
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer wants the pipeline shut down for fear of an environmental disaster in the Straits of Mackinac, an ecologically sensitive waterway in the Great Lakes.
Could ongoing pipeline disputes fuel a hike at the pumps?
Enbridge has rejected Whitmer’s claim that the company has violated the terms of its agreement with Michigan to operate the line, which transports oil and natural gas liquids, and has refused to shut it down voluntarily.
The two sides are currently engaged in court-ordered mediation talks.
© 2021 The Canadian Press